While he acknowledged the “Presbyterian influencers” sometimes had more impact in immediate communications than the church’s official channels, ultimately in-person visits by the church moderator, and sharing of verified data to refute false claims, successfully stemmed the tide of misinformation.
“What the church’s official channel does, it helps at least get the right information into the space,” said Toddison.
Jane Ng’ang'a from the Ecumenical Pharmaceutical Network shared a case study about how the network coped with vast amounts of disinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
As government officials were slow in providing accurate information, people started creating their own, she said.
“Government channels took too long before providing information, and that gave people time to really bring in disinformation and misinformation to fill in the gaps,” she said. “There was limited access to accurate and contextually appropriate information.”
In addition, limited funding for training and deployment of medical staff provided a breeding ground for disinformation, which quickly grew into conspiracy theories.
Ng’ang’a showed how that, although much disinformation may be out of one’s control, laying the groundwork ahead of the next public health emergency could stem the tide.
“I think that preparing and strengthening the multi-stakeholder engagement is quite critical,” she said.
Lekan Otufodunrin, a journalist and communications expert from Lagos, Nigeria, offered comments from a media perspective on how journalists—and their audiences—can make sure they’re not sharing disinformation.
“It’s important to counter it,” he said, urging people not to be “compulsive sharers” without checking their sources.
He also acknowledged that checking information has become time-consuming for many people as they try to determine whether media outlets are reputable or not.
“We live in an age where anybody can publish,” Otufodunrin said. “Almost everybody can be a journalist.”
He advised people and organizations to work to develop their own standard through which they determine what’s reputable. “People need to train themselves that they cannot get information from just anywhere,” he said. “We need to crosscheck. We need to be very careful.”
Otufodunrin also urged churches, when they respond to disinformation, not to adopt a dismissive tone. “Churches need to show they care, and they must also be very transparent,” he advised.
WCC director of the Commission of Churches on International Affairs Peter Prove summarized the insights from the speakers, and challenged churches to learn from these experiences. “Disinformation has a very serious impact on the church itself and on the wider society,” he said. “The problem is, that we know social media has instantaneous and often wide global transmission—and it’s impossible to counter every time with direct personal engagement.”
Sara Speicher, WACC deputy general secretary, who moderated the conversation, shared existing resources to help churches navigate this issue. “We know that there are many ways we can continue this conversation and continue the work,” she said. “We also have some existing resources that we could share to expand our general awareness of the realities of digital communication, and to make us more critical fact checkers."
Watch the video of the webinar
WACC - Communication for all
WCC Commission of the Churches on International Affairs
No comments:
Post a Comment